Fundraising Fox

Deal analysis · estimated

Airtable × Bending Spoons: who got the money home

On August 4, 2026, Bending Spoons agreed to acquire Airtable at an enterprise value of $1.285bn — which, per the acquirer's own press release, implies an equity value of roughly $2.25bn once Airtable's unspent cash is counted. That second number is what shareholders actually split, and splitting it is where it gets interesting: Airtable raised $1.35bn, and most of it sat senior to the common stock.

The round history

From public reporting; * marks post-money values we estimated where none was disclosed.

RoundYearRaisedPost-moneyFD % at exit
Seed2015$3m$12m*9.9%
Series A2015$7.6m$38m*9.9%
Series B2018$52m$152m*25.8%
Series C2018$100m$1.1bn7.5%
Series D2020$185m$2.585bn6.4%
Series E2021$270m$5.77bn4.4%
Series F2021$735m$11.7bn*6.3%

The waterfall at ~$2.25bn

With standard 1x non-participating preferences, every investor class faces the same choice at exit: take your money back, or convert and share what's left. At this price, everyone from the Series C on does better taking the pref — that's $1.29bn off the top. The remaining ~$960m belongs to common holders and the converting early rounds.

ClassInvestedOutcomeEst. payoutMultiple
Series F$735mtook the 1x pref$735m~1x (par)
Series E$270mtook the 1x pref$270m~1x (par)
Series D$185mtook the 1x pref$185m~1x (par)
Series C$100mtook the 1x pref$100m~1x (par)
Series B$52mconverted~$328m~6.3x
Series A$7.6mconverted~$126m~17x
Seed$3mconverted~$126m~42x

The part almost everyone missed

Thirteen days before the announcement, a brand-new entity called Formagrid Holdings LLC (Formagrid is Airtable's legal name) filed two SEC Form Ds — from Airtable's own headquarters at 1 Front Street, San Francisco, with Airtable's CFO listed, and the "business combination transaction" box ticked. The deal was visible in public filings nearly two weeks early. That's exactly what our deal radar watches for, every hour.

Assumptions & caveats

This is a directional estimate built only on publicly reported round data. It assumes vanilla terms — 1x non-participating preferences, later rounds senior, no structure, no secondaries — and stated ownership assumptions for founders and employees. Actual terms are private and could change this picture materially. Better data or disagree with the model? Tell us and we'll update the analysis: corrections@fundraisingfox.com.