Bling Capital vs IVP (Institutional Venture Partners)
Two firms that co-invest: side by side on stage, sector, check size, and track record, from public filings and the firms' own sites.
| Bling Capital | IVP (Institutional Venture Partners) | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Venture capital | Venture capital |
| HQ | Miami Beach | San Francisco |
| Founded | 2018 | 1974 |
| Check size | $1M – $5M | $15M – $75M |
| Stages | Pre-Seed, Seed, Series A | Series B, Series C, Growth, Late Stage |
| Sectors | Consumer, Data & Infrastructure, Deep Tech, Defense Tech, Digital Health, Enterprise Software, Fintech, Healthtech, Marketplaces, Retail Tech, SaaS, Sector Agnostic | AI & Machine Learning, Consumer, Fintech, SaaS, Sector Agnostic |
| AUM | $270M | $8.7B |
| Tracked investments | 133 | 160 |
| Exits (acquired/public) | 9 | 14 |
| Dated deals, last 24 mo | 2 | 1 |
Shared portfolio · 5
Frequently asked questions
- Do Bling Capital and IVP (Institutional Venture Partners) invest together?
- Yes — Bling Capital and IVP (Institutional Venture Partners) appear together in 5 tracked portfolio companies, including Attentive, Lime, Pindrop, Zenefits, Paradigm Evergreen.
- How do Bling Capital and IVP (Institutional Venture Partners) compare on check size?
- Bling Capital typically writes checks of $1M – $5M, while IVP (Institutional Venture Partners) writes $15M – $75M.